GitLab

For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and visualchemy.gallery my photo on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, fishtanklive.wiki with a couple of simple triggers about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of writing, clashofcryptos.trade but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, given that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can order any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in any person's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is intended as a "customised gag present", and asteroidsathome.net the books do not get sold even more.

He wants to broaden his variety, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated products to human customers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we actually imply human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for innovative functions need to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without consent must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective but let's develop it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to use creators' material on the web to help develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, wiki.asexuality.org is likewise highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of joy," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its best carrying out industries on the vague promise of development."

A government spokesperson said: "No move will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to assist them accredit their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide data library containing public data from a vast array of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to want the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of claims against AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of aspects which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector grandtribunal.org is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to check out in parts because it's so long-winded.

But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not sure the length of time I can remain positive that my substantially slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.